diffutils: Inexact

 
 10.3.3 Helping 'patch' Find Inexact Matches
 -------------------------------------------
 
 For context diffs, and to a lesser extent normal diffs, 'patch' can
 detect when the line numbers mentioned in the patch are incorrect, and
 it attempts to find the correct place to apply each hunk of the patch.
 As a first guess, it takes the line number mentioned in the hunk, plus
 or minus any offset used in applying the previous hunk.  If that is not
 the correct place, 'patch' scans both forward and backward for a set of
 lines matching the context given in the hunk.
 
    First 'patch' looks for a place where all lines of the context match.
 If it cannot find such a place, and it is reading a context or unified
 diff, and the maximum fuzz factor is set to 1 or more, then 'patch'
 makes another scan, ignoring the first and last line of context.  If
 that fails, and the maximum fuzz factor is set to 2 or more, it makes
 another scan, ignoring the first two and last two lines of context are
 ignored.  It continues similarly if the maximum fuzz factor is larger.
 
    The '--fuzz=LINES' ('-F LINES') option sets the maximum fuzz factor
 to LINES.  This option only applies to context and unified diffs; it
 ignores up to LINES lines while looking for the place to install a hunk.
 Note that a larger fuzz factor increases the odds of making a faulty
 patch.  The default fuzz factor is 2; there is no point to setting it to
 more than the number of lines of context in the diff, ordinarily 3.
 
    If 'patch' cannot find a place to install a hunk of the patch, it
 writes the hunk out to a reject file (⇒Reject Names, for
 information on how reject files are named).  It writes out rejected
 hunks in context format no matter what form the input patch is in.  If
 the input is a normal or 'ed' diff, many of the contexts are simply
 null.  The line numbers on the hunks in the reject file may be different
 from those in the patch file: they show the approximate location where
 'patch' thinks the failed hunks belong in the new file rather than in
 the old one.
 
    If the '--verbose' option is given, then as it completes each hunk
 'patch' tells you whether the hunk succeeded or failed, and if it
 failed, on which line (in the new file) 'patch' thinks the hunk should
 go.  If this is different from the line number specified in the diff, it
 tells you the offset.  A single large offset _may_ indicate that 'patch'
 installed a hunk in the wrong place.  'patch' also tells you if it used
 a fuzz factor to make the match, in which case you should also be
 slightly suspicious.
 
    'patch' cannot tell if the line numbers are off in an 'ed' script,
 and can only detect wrong line numbers in a normal diff when it finds a
 change or delete command.  It may have the same problem with a context
 diff using a fuzz factor equal to or greater than the number of lines of
 context shown in the diff (typically 3).  In these cases, you should
 probably look at a context diff between your original and patched input
 files to see if the changes make sense.  Compiling without errors is a
 pretty good indication that the patch worked, but not a guarantee.
 
    A patch against an empty file applies to a nonexistent file, and vice
 versa.  ⇒Creating and Removing.
 
    'patch' usually produces the correct results, even when it must make
 many guesses.  However, the results are guaranteed only when the patch
 is applied to an exact copy of the file that the patch was generated
 from.